Thesis

Does participatory budgeting improve local democracy : a comparative study of Central Java and Northeast Scotland

Downloadable Content

Download PDF
Creator
Rights statement
Awarding institution
  • University of Strathclyde
Date of award
  • 2025
Thesis identifier
  • T17393
Person Identifier (Local)
  • 202193088
Qualification Level
Qualification Name
Department, School or Faculty
Abstract
  • Participatory Budgeting (PB) has grown rapidly as part of a range of democratic innovations with the aim of reinvigorating participatory democracy during a time of declining trust in institutions. However, questions remain about the potential of these instruments to contribute to transformative change. Against this background, the objective of this thesis is to investigate how and why PB improves local democracy. The study contributes to the literature by integrating three important aspects of PB -- design, embeddedness and outcomes -- which have been predominantly studied in isolation or limited combinations in existing research. The research utilised a subnational paired comparison design centred around four specific case studies: two in Central Java, Indonesia (the cities of Surakarta and Semarang) and two in Scotland, United Kingdom (the local authorities of Fife and Moray), where PB has been nationally legislated. Semi-structured interviews were carried out with 56 PB participants, organisers and civil society stakeholders. These responses were triangulated with observation notes and photography from field visits and other available secondary data. Key findings include that PB is helping to bring communities and local governments closer together and that the mechanism brings modest results in responsiveness to community needs. However, a greater scale and ambition is needed to strengthen citizens’ perceptions of local governments. A relationship between PB design, embeddedness and PB outcomes was found in which improvements to design improved embeddedness and vice versa, and outcomes such as community-level change were more apparent. In generating evidence across multiple case studies in two highly contrasting country settings in Europe and Asia, this thesis has developed a deeper understanding of how design and embeddedness factors interact and contribute to the improvement of government-community relations. Key words: participatory budgeting, deliberative democracy, embeddedness.
Advisor / supervisor
  • Hill-O'Connor, Clementine
  • Mendez, Carlos, Dr.
Resource Type
DOI

Relations

Items

Thumbnail Title Date Uploaded Visibility Actions
file details PDF of thesis T17393 2025-06-13 Public Download