Thesis
  Essays on investment in carbon capture technology: the role of markets, competitors and policy
- Creator
 - Rights statement
 - Awarding institution
 - University of Strathclyde
 
- Date of award
 - 2022
 
- Thesis identifier
 - T16212
 
- Person Identifier (Local)
 - 201677952
 
- Qualification Level
 - Qualification Name
 - Department, School or Faculty
 - Abstract
 - In this thesis, three different economic models under an industrial organization approach are presented modelling different types of carbon capture technology adoption. The thesis aims to understand the incentives that drive a carbon capture technology decision making at a firm level and develop policy solutions to inform government and policymakers to increase carbon capture technology adoption. The first model constructed considers a carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology adoption in different competitive environments. The focus is to explore how competition influences a firm’s decision toward CCS technology. The second model investigates the strategic interaction that firms experience in an industry where a firm adopts carbon capture and CO2 utilization (CCU). The model also evaluates the environmental impact of a CCU industry, as a major drawback of final goods produced by CO2 utilization is the carbon emissions are released back into the atmosphere once consumed in the final goods market. In this chapter, a series of policy solutions are proposed to obtain an increase in the adoption of CCU whilst accomplishing a positive environmental impact. The third model investigates the optimal CCS adoption decision time of a follower influenced by a learning-by-doing and spillover effect. A follower is a firm that adopts a second-generation CCS technology with a lower production cost caused by a learning effect from a pioneer. A pioneer is a firm that adopts a first-generation CCS technology with a high production cost, and it experiences a learning-by-doing effect. We discover, that if the adoption of CCS technology is sequential, a pioneer is always at an economic disadvantage by adopting first. The main contribution of this chapter recommends a policy solution that balances the adoption cost of a pioneer and a follower, achieving an increase in the diffusion of CCS technology.
 
- Advisor / supervisor
 - Nimubona, Alain-Dersire
 - Dickson, Alex, 1979-
 - Quigley, John
 
- Resource Type
 - DOI
 - Date Created
 - 2021
 
- Funder
 
Relations
Items
| Thumbnail | Title | Date Uploaded | Visibility | Actions | 
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 
     | 
  PDF of thesis T16212 | 2022-06-22 | Public | Download |